Biophilic Design in Architecture and Its Contributions to Health, Well-being, and Sustainability: A Critical Review (2024)

Zhong, W., Schröder, T. W. A. (2022). Biophilic Design in Architecture and Its Contributions to Health, Well-being, and Sustainability: A Critical Review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006

Zhong, Weijie ; Schröder, Torsten W.A. ; Bekkering, Juliette D. / Biophilic Design in Architecture and Its Contributions to Health, Well-being, and Sustainability : A Critical Review. In: Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2022 ; Vol. 11, Nr. 1. blz. 114-141.

@article{39ee606659f34a7a99b7f6760cb59c20,

title = "Biophilic Design in Architecture and Its Contributions to Health, Well-being, and Sustainability: A Critical Review",

abstract = "In the last ten years, {\textquoteleft}nature{\textquoteright} and biophilic design have received widespread attention in architecture, especially in response to growing environmental challenges. However, open questions and controversies remain regarding conceptualizing and addressing {\textquoteleft}nature{\textquoteright} in practice and research. This study conducts a literature review to discuss biophilic design as a theoretical framework to interpret {\textquoteleft}nature{\textquoteright} in architecture. The following questions are answered: (1) How has the concept of biophilic design emerged, and how can it be defined? (2) In what ways can biophilic design contribute to the goals of sustainable architecture? (3) What are the key design strategies in biophilic design? This review identifies and compares the key frameworks of biophilic design and explains their major elements. We then analyse the benefits (e.g. enhance health, well-being, productivity, biodiversity, and circularity) of biophilic design in achieving sustainability, as framed through the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The results indicate that biophilic design is more complex and richer than the mere application of vegetation in buildings; it broadens the variety through encompassing different types of nature from physical, sensory, metaphorical, morphological, material to spiritual. Moreover, knowledge gaps are identified to motivate future research and critical reflections on biophilic design practices.",

keywords = "Biophilic design, Biophilic architecture, Sustainability, Sustainable architecture, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Nature-based solutions",

author = "Weijie Zhong and Schr{\"o}der, {Torsten W.A.} and Bekkering, {Juliette D.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors",

year = "2022",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "114--141",

journal = "Frontiers of Architectural Research",

issn = "2095-2635",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "1",

}

Zhong, W, Schröder, TWA 2022, 'Biophilic Design in Architecture and Its Contributions to Health, Well-being, and Sustainability: A Critical Review', Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 11, nr. 1, blz. 114-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006

Biophilic Design in Architecture and Its Contributions to Health, Well-being, and Sustainability: A Critical Review. / Zhong, Weijie (Corresponding author); Schröder, Torsten W.A.; Bekkering, Juliette D.
In: Frontiers of Architectural Research, Vol. 11, Nr. 1, 02.2022, blz. 114-141.

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschrift › Tijdschriftartikel › Academic › peer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biophilic Design in Architecture and Its Contributions to Health, Well-being, and Sustainability

T2 - A Critical Review

AU - Zhong, Weijie

AU - Schröder, Torsten W.A.

AU - Bekkering, Juliette D.

N1 - Publisher Copyright:© 2021 The Authors

PY - 2022/2

Y1 - 2022/2

N2 - In the last ten years, ‘nature’ and biophilic design have received widespread attention in architecture, especially in response to growing environmental challenges. However, open questions and controversies remain regarding conceptualizing and addressing ‘nature’ in practice and research. This study conducts a literature review to discuss biophilic design as a theoretical framework to interpret ‘nature’ in architecture. The following questions are answered: (1) How has the concept of biophilic design emerged, and how can it be defined? (2) In what ways can biophilic design contribute to the goals of sustainable architecture? (3) What are the key design strategies in biophilic design? This review identifies and compares the key frameworks of biophilic design and explains their major elements. We then analyse the benefits (e.g. enhance health, well-being, productivity, biodiversity, and circularity) of biophilic design in achieving sustainability, as framed through the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The results indicate that biophilic design is more complex and richer than the mere application of vegetation in buildings; it broadens the variety through encompassing different types of nature from physical, sensory, metaphorical, morphological, material to spiritual. Moreover, knowledge gaps are identified to motivate future research and critical reflections on biophilic design practices.

AB - In the last ten years, ‘nature’ and biophilic design have received widespread attention in architecture, especially in response to growing environmental challenges. However, open questions and controversies remain regarding conceptualizing and addressing ‘nature’ in practice and research. This study conducts a literature review to discuss biophilic design as a theoretical framework to interpret ‘nature’ in architecture. The following questions are answered: (1) How has the concept of biophilic design emerged, and how can it be defined? (2) In what ways can biophilic design contribute to the goals of sustainable architecture? (3) What are the key design strategies in biophilic design? This review identifies and compares the key frameworks of biophilic design and explains their major elements. We then analyse the benefits (e.g. enhance health, well-being, productivity, biodiversity, and circularity) of biophilic design in achieving sustainability, as framed through the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The results indicate that biophilic design is more complex and richer than the mere application of vegetation in buildings; it broadens the variety through encompassing different types of nature from physical, sensory, metaphorical, morphological, material to spiritual. Moreover, knowledge gaps are identified to motivate future research and critical reflections on biophilic design practices.

KW - Biophilic design

KW - Biophilic architecture

KW - Sustainability

KW - Sustainable architecture

KW - Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

KW - Nature-based solutions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113942704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85113942704

SN - 2095-2635

VL - 11

SP - 114

EP - 141

JO - Frontiers of Architectural Research

JF - Frontiers of Architectural Research

IS - 1

ER -

Zhong W, Schröder TWA, Bekkering JD. Biophilic Design in Architecture and Its Contributions to Health, Well-being, and Sustainability: A Critical Review. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2022 feb.;11(1):114-141. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006